TY  - JOUR
U1  - Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
A1  - Stach, Jens
T1  - How memorable experiences influence brand preference
JF  - Qualitative Market Research
N2  - Purpose
This paper aims to illuminate mechanisms through which memorable experiences with brands create lasting preferences. It is based on the proposition that intense positive (negative) affective consumption in the consumer’s youth creates powerful imprints, which influence brand preference (distaste) throughout life.

Design/methodology/approach
Autobiographical memories with Nutella are retrieved from three different user groups, i.e. heavy-, light- and non-users. The retrieved memory narratives are analysed using conditioning theory, i.e. operant, classical or no conditioning are identified and compared across groups.

Findings
The research’s central proposition is affirmed, yet the dominant form of conditioning mechanism differs per group. Operant conditioning outperforms classical conditioning in creating strong and lasting preferences. Heavy- and non-users predominantly exhibit in-tensely positive and negative operant conditioning, respectively. Light-users on the other hand recall less affectively intense consumption experiences, mainly featuring classical conditioning. The light-users’ recollections suggest a mere exposure effect to be more appropriate in describing the preference formation in this user group.

Research limitations/implications
Users not having experienced affectively intense consumption, i.e. light-users, are likely to be influenced in their preference over time through other factors, which this paper does not focus on.

Practical implications
Memory elicitation and exploration provides valuable insights to shape both promotional as well as advertising strategies.

Originality/value
The study extends existing theory on conditioning in marketing by first using a novel qualitative approach to analyse conditioning procedures in real-life settings, and second, it highlights operant conditioning’s superior ability in creating lasting preferences.
KW  - Autobiographical memories
KW  - Conditioning theory
KW  - Imprinting
KW  - Memory elicitation
KW  - Memory narratives
KW  - Negative binominal distribution
Y1  - 2017
SN  - 1352-2752
SS  - 1352-2752
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-03-2016-0023
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-03-2016-0023
VL  - 20
IS  - 4
SP  - 394
EP  - 415
ER  -