Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (6)
Keywords
Institute
Too much of a good thing?
(2020)
Recent research highlights the positive effects of organizational CSR engagement on employee outcomes, such as job and life satisfaction, performance, and trust. We argue that the current debate fails to recognize the potential risks associated with CSR. In this study, we focus on the risk of work addiction. We hypothesize that CSR has per se a positive effect on employees and can be classified as a resource. However, we also suggest the existence of an array of unintended negative effects of CSR. Since CSR positively influences an employee’s organizational identification, as well as his or her perception of engaging in meaningful work, which in turn motivates them to work harder while neglecting other spheres of their lives such as private relationships or health, CSR indirectly increases work addiction. Accordingly, organizational identification and work meaningfulness both act as buffering variables in the relationship, thus suppressing the negative effect of CSR on work addiction, which weakens the positive role of CSR in the workplace. Drawing on a sample of 565 Swiss employees taken from the 2017 Swiss Public Value Atlas dataset, our results provide support for our rationale. Our results also provide evidence that the positive indirect effects of organizational CSR engagement on work addiction, via organizational identification and work meaningfulness, become even stronger when employees care for the welfare of the wider public (i.e., the community, nation, or world). Implications for research and practice are discussed.
The valuation of values
(2018)
The doctoral thesis explores the relationship of Business and Society in four essays. The growing public, corporate and academic interest in organizational contribution to society – in this thesis measured as Public Value, Shared Value and Corporate Social Responsibility – poses the question how we can determine value creation beyond financial benefits. The thesis provides psychological and sociological perspectives to shed light on this pressuring question. The psychological view in essay four shows that value is rooted in relationship between an observing subject and an object that is to be evaluated, thus, it is not objectively out there. This perspective is rooted in motivational psychology of basic human needs upon which individuals assess the contribution of organizations to society. Adding to this emotional-affective perspective on human psychology, we show that cognition (‘cognitive styles’) plays a vital role in individuals’ determination of how value for society is created. Essay three provides evidence that how an individual perceives value creation for society reciprocally affects the individual. We show that employees who perceive their organizations’ value creation more strongly, also derive higher levels of meaningfulness from their work and identify more strongly with their employing organization, which in turn is related to higher levels of work addiction. The final paper takes a sociological perspective borrowed from the actor network theory and shows that some discourses concerning corporate value creation for society narrow the concept of value for society down to a self-serving notion for corporations. In a case study, the essay not only shows how this narrow concept infuses corporate action but, moreover, it details how it negatively impacts society. The multi-facetted approach of the dissertation furthers the understanding of the notion of value creation for society as much as it poses new questions and calls for ambivalent investigation.
Making sense of a most popular metaphor in management: towards a hedgefox scale for cognitive styles
(2017)
Research on cognitive style has gathered momentum over the past 40 years, especially with respect to learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. This iestigation adapts Tetlock’s hedgehog–fox scale for German-speaking respondents through three large-scale studies (n = 17,072) and examines the influence of cognitive style on employees’ public value assessments of their employing organizations. Our data led us to propose a revised and more economical HedgeFox Scale. In contrast with Tetlock’s findings, our results provide empirical and theoretical arguments for a two-factor structure. This shift in dimensionality affects the nature of the construct and aligns hedgehog–fox research with the latest developments in cognitive style research. Our results contribute to the ongoing interest in the dimensionality of cognitive styles and support the call for a more diverse picture. Finally, we provide recommendations for individuals and organizations.
Public administrations are required by law to contribute to society, thus obliged to shape the common good. What value they have to society is uncovered by their public value. This chapter provides an approach to public value management that is relevant for organizations, NGOs, and governmental institutions, in order to systematically iestigate their contributions to society. Previous work on public value serves as a good starting point, providing significant public value perspectives. We follow this by a conceptual delineation of the public value concept according to Timo Meynhardt, who roots the notion of value in psychological needs theory and thereby links public value directly to a conditio humana. As cases in point, we identify and discuss two management tools, the Public Value Scorecard (PVSC) and the Public Value Atlas. We conclude with a short reflection on how public value can advance public sector management.
Making sense of a most popular metaphor in management: towards a HedgeFox scale for cognitive styles
(2016)
In the field of business and management, research on cognition has increased over the last 40 years (Armstrong, Cools & Sadler-Smith, 2012). It gathered momentum, especially in the context of learning, problem solving, and social behavior (Riding & Sadler-Smith, 1997; Chan, 1996; Armstrong & Priola, 2001). A popular example of individual style differences goes back to Tetlock (2005). Based on Isaiah Berlin’s interpretation of the hedgehog-and-fox metaphor, Tetlock studied how cognitive styles influence political expert decision making. He proposed a one-dimensional Hedgehog-Fox Factor that turns the dichotomy into the two poles of a measurement continuum. Our study’s objective is to adapt and validate Tetlock's Hedgehog-Fox Scale to measure the cognitive styles by means of three studies in Germany and Switzerland (N = 4483; N = 5052; N = 7537). Our data lead us to propose a revised and more economic HedgeFox Scale (HFS). However, and in sharp contrast to Tetlock’s findings, the current study provides methodological and theoretical arguments for a two-factor structure. This shift in the dimensionality not only affects the very nature of the construct in question, but also contributes to a recent discussion on cognitive styles’ very structure. Especially for the use in business and management, the HedgeFox-Scale is a coenient instrument to assess cognitive style differences in decision-making processes. _x000D_ Keywords: Cognitive style; scale development; hedgehog-fox; metaphor; managerial cognition