Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Refine
Document Type
- Article (54)
- Part of a Book (11)
- Book (1)
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence (8)
- Systematic literature review (6)
- Dynamic capabilities (5)
- Innovation (5)
- Business model innovation (4)
- Adoption (3)
- Business model (3)
- Entrepreneurship (3)
- Open innovation (3)
- Ambidexterity (2)
Institute
- Chair of Strategic Entrepreneurship (32)
- Chair of Accounting and Auditing (4)
- Chair of Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer (4)
- Chair of Strategic Management and Digital Entrepreneurship (4)
- Chair of Digital Innovation in Service Industries (3)
- Chair of Economics and Information Systems (3)
- Chair of Microeconomics (2)
- HHL (2)
- Chair of Economic and Business Ethics (1)
- Chair of Financial Management (1)
Innovating beyond boundaries
(2025)
This article analyses how firms enhance their dynamic capabilities through open innovation activities. While previous research has acknowledged the potential of integrating dynamic capabilities and open innovation, existing studies are fragmented in that they neither build upon one another nor offer a comprehensive framework. Instead, they often focus on isolated aspects of dynamic capabilities, resulting in disparate, incoherent insights. This fragmentation hinders the development of actionable insights for organizations aiming to systematically enhance their innovation processes through open innovation. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify key dimensions that link open innovation activities to the sensing, seizing and transforming phases-the core components of dynamic capabilities. The resulting framework offers an integrative perspective that goes beyond fragmented research findings and provides a structured approach to operationalizing open innovation. The framework transitions open innovation from an abstract concept to a practical tool that can be systematically embedded into firms' innovation processes. Additionally, by situating dynamic capabilities within the context of innovation management, the framework expands their theoretical and practical utility. This study provides actionable insights for practitioners and establishes a consolidated foundation for future research, thus enhancing the theoretical and practical impacts of open innovation.
Purpose
This study aims to explore the potential of entrepreneurship through acquisition (ETA) in the underexplored sector of small and medium-sized web-based businesses, addressing the succession crisis in industrialized nations and offering insights into the digital ETA landscape.
Design/methodology/approach
The research uses a qualitative approach, conducting in-depth interviews with 19 established website owners from diverse backgrounds and industries. The study investigates their business models, selling motivations and characteristics to provide insights for potential buyers in the digital ETA space.
Findings
Web-based small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) present unique opportunities for ETA, characterized by lower initial investment, higher scalability and diverse revenue streams. Key considerations for buyers include understanding seller motivations, evaluating niche focus and assessing the impact of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence on content creation and search engine optimization. The findings also highlight the importance of authenticity and user engagement in maintaining website value.
Practical implications
The findings offer valuable insights for entrepreneurs considering ETA in the digital space, highlighting critical factors for success, potential risks and mitigation strategies in acquiring web-based businesses.
Originality/value
This paper bridges a significant gap in ETA literature by focusing on web-based SMEs, which have previously been overlooked despite their growing importance in the digital economy. It provides a comprehensive analysis of relevant factors when evaluating web-based businesses in the context of ETA, particularly in light of technological advancements and changing online landscapes.
Organizational agility (OA), the ability of an organization to adapt to rapidly changing environments and reconfigure its structure and operations, has become a critical capability for achieving and sustaining competitive advantage. However, existing frameworks for OA often adopt narrow, industry-specific perspectives, neglecting the broader interplay of contextual factors, internal and external antecedents, and multidimensional capabilities. This study addresses this gap by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) of 110 peer-reviewed articles from three leading academic databases. Guided by an inductive approach and the grounded theory methodology, this research identifies and categorizes the key antecedents of OA into four interconnected dimensions: contextual factors, fundamental attributes, vital enablers, and dynamic capabilities. The findings reconceptualize OA as a bundle of interrelated dynamic capabilities—encompassing macro-agility (e.g., strategic and partnering agility) and micro-agility (e.g., operational, innovation, and workforce agility)—rather than a singular construct. This multidimensional concept bridges theoretical gaps, integrating insights from contingency, agency and resource-based theories to explain the dynamic relationship between internal and external antecedents. The study offers a foundation for future research and provides actionable guidance for practitioners seeking to design agile organizations capable of thriving in dynamic capabilities.
Purpose
In this study, we investigate how capability in managing intellectual property may be treated as a type of “dynamic capability,” and we seek to understand how, when it is linked to the new technology development capability of a complex technological organization, these two types of dynamic capabilities may coevolve.
Design/methodology/approach
We conducted a longitudinal empirical case study of Airbus, incorporating an abductive research methodology that required investigating theory and empirical data concurrently and iteratively. The data, ranging over a period of two decades from 2000 to 2021, was collected from four different sources, including interviews, internal company documents, publicly available information and patent data.
Findings
Our main findings are that the capabilities and roles of the Intellectual Property function in Airbus and their interaction with the company's Technology function have indeed influenced the overall innovation strategy of the organization, and that three coevolutionary phases may be identified in the interactive development of the two functions.
Research limitations/implications
Our investigation into how new technology development and intellectual property (IP) management capabilities coevolve within complex technological organizations, exemplified by Airbus, provides significant theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, it enhances understanding of capability co-development dynamics in complex organizations, particularly in strategic IP management. Practically, it suggests aligning IP strategy with overall corporate objectives and optimizing organizational structures to promote collaboration and efficiency across IP and technology teams. This alignment may foster innovation, maximize the value of intellectual assets and strengthen collaborations, positioning organizations for long-term success in competitive landscapes.
Originality/value
This study makes a fresh contribution to the innovation studies literature by showing how if intellectual property management is treated as a core function of a complex technological organization – rather than simply as a vehicle for protecting new inventions and products after the fact or simply as a constituent part of the organization's legal function – it may contribute proactively to the organization's technological innovation performance. We also address the current gap in the academic literature for a clear understanding of the processes by which different function-specific dynamic capabilities may coevolve in a complex organization operating as part of a dynamic and complex adaptive system.
We modify the Rényi (1961) axioms for entropy to apply to negative (“signed”) measures as arise, for example, in phase-space representations of quantum mechanics. We obtain two new measures of (lack of) information about a system – which we propose as signed analogs to classical Shannon entropy and classical Rényi entropy, respectively. We show that signed Rényi entropy witnesses non-classicality of a system. Specifically, a measure has at least one negative component if and only if signed Rényi α-entropy is negative for some α > 1. The corresponding non-classicality test does not work with signed Shannon entropy. We next show that signed Rényi 2k-entropy, when k is a positive integer, is Schurconcave. (An example shows that signed Shannon entropy is not Schur-concave.) We then establish an abstract quantum H-theorem for signed measures. We prove that signed Rényi 2k-entropy is nondecreasing under classical (“decohering”) evolution of a signed measure, where the latter could be a Wigner function or other phase-space representation of a quantum system. (An example shows that signed Shannon entropy may be non-monotonic.) We also provide a characterization of the Second Law for signed Rényi 2-entropy in terms of what we call eventual classicalization of evolution of a system. We conclude with an argument that signed Rényi 2-entropy of the Wigner function is constant under Moyal bracket evolution.
Any quasi-probability representation of a no-signaling system – including quantum systems – can be simulated via a purely classical scheme by allowing signed events and a cancellation procedure. This raises a fundamental question: What properties of the non-classical system does such a classical simulation fail to replicate? We answer by using large deviation theory to show that the probability of a large fluctuation under the classical simulation can be strictly greater than under the actual non-classical system. The key finding driving our result is that negativity in probability relaxes the data processing inequality of information theory. We propose this potential large deviation stability of quantum (and no-signaling) systems as a novel form of quantum advantage.
This paper investigates the emerging potential of metaverse technology and the diverse opportunities it presents for companies across industries. Although the metaverse remains in its nascent stages, its swift evolution has introduced a broad spectrum of use cases that hold significant promise for businesses. However, despite the evident potential, there remains a limited understanding of how metaverse technology can be effectively applied to benefit business operations and strategy. To address this gap, this study employs a scoping review methodology, systematically collecting and analyzing data from academic literature, publicly available sources, and company websites. The comprehensive review identified 101 distinct use cases of metaverse technology, which were subsequently categorized into three primary application fields: developing new product and service offerings, enhancing customer experience, and optimizing internal business processes. These findings not only provide a compelling rationale for companies contemplating the adoption of metaverse technology but also represent the first extensive exploration of its applications across diverse fields and industries. The study offers valuable insights that are crucial for both academic researchers and business practitioners who are keen to understand and leverage the transformative potential of the metaverse. By mapping out the current landscape of metaverse applications, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of how companies can harness this technology to drive innovation, improve operational efficiency, and create new value propositions in an increasingly immersive and interconnected world.
Adopting AI-based solutions is now widely regarded as an essential consideration in organisations’ innovation strategies. For healthcare institutions, such solutions are an especially promising means to address societal and organisational challenges, including rising demand combined with shortages of qualified staff. The technology may enhance the efficiency of, for example, detecting diseases and planning treatments, which are time-consuming when executed manually. However, empirical research related to how AI can be effectively adopted in healthcare to harness these opportunities remains scarce. To address this gap, we conduct an exploratory multiple case study comprising 13 cases in the radiotherapy domain. Taking over an adoption theory perspective, we uncover that organisational, environmental, technological and individual factors are decisive for effective adoption of AI and contribute to the emergence of efficiency gains and standardisation. Our analysis reveals that organisational factors such as pursuing a dedicated innovation strategy within the radiotherapy department as well as a holistic AI implementation strategy are most crucial. In determining and relating the identified relevant factors, we contribute to adoption theory and AI-enabled value creation in healthcare. Further, we advise managers of healthcare institutions on how to effectively adopt AI to overcome challenges at organisational and societal levels.
The concept of coopetition - simultaneous collaboration and competition between organizations to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes - plays a pivotal role in shaping business performance, particularly during periods of rapid technological advancements. This is especially evident the manufacturing sector, where innovation and competitive dynamics intersect with economic and social forces. The current academic discourse predominantly focuses on the qualitative identification and analysis of coopetition attributes, leaving a significant gap for large-scale quantitative studies to enable empirical assessment. This study aims to examine the significance of three groups of coopetition attributes for coopetition performance classified into two strategic (dynamics, paradoxicality), six relational (asymmetry, complexity, coopetition intensity, mutual dependence, strength, tensions), and five behavioral attributes (competition intensity, conflict, formality, investments, trust). Using data from 1216 manufacturing firms in Poland and employing a generalized Covariance based Structural Equation Model (CB-SEM), this study offers nuanced insights to the global discourse at the intersection of technological change and social dynamics. The results indicate that the strategic attribute paradoxicality, the relational attribute strength, and most of the behavioral attributes (trust, competition intensity, investments, formality) positively impact coopetition performance. Additionally, a significant negative impact of the strategic attribute dynamics was demonstrated, while no significant influence was identified for the remaining relational attributes (asymmetry, tensions) as well as the behavioral attribute conflict. Diverging from prior qualitative approaches, this study offers data-driven insights for decision-makers navigating societal and technological change, highlighting which attributes should be stimulated to enhance coopetition performance while minimizing the level of dynamics within coopetition strategies.
The Future Combat Air System (FCAS), a sixth-generation advanced combat aircraft, is assumed to be the largest European defence development and production programme of the 21st century and a core pillar of European cooperation in the defence sector. The 2017-initiated collaboration programme is led by Germany and France, with Spain and Belgium joining as partners, and is a who-is-who of the largest European defence companies, including Airbus Defence and Space, Thales, Safran, MBDA, and MTU. While such defence programmes have significant military, political, industrial, and economic impacts, the economic dimension in terms of economic costs and benefits is often under-represented in academic discussions. As the FCAS is still a nascent programme, only rough estimates of the total programme cost are available, and assumptions range from €100 bn to more than a trillion. With our research, we aim to contribute to the academic discussion by estimating the true economic costs and benefits of the FCAS. We use a mixed approach of data triangulation by cross-checking open source intelligence (OSINT) with expert interviews to estimate the full programme life-cycle costs. Furthermore, we estimate its economic impact on the European gross value added, employment, and tax by utilising an input – output (IO) model.