TY  - RPRT
U1  - Forschungsbericht
A1  - Binder, Kunigunde
A1  - Bonatto Minella, Christian
A1  - Elberskirch, Linda
A1  - Kraegeloh, Annette
A1  - Liebing, Julia
A1  - Petzold, Christiane
A1  - Razum, Matthias
A1  - Riefler, Norbert
A1  - Schins, Roel P. F.
A1  - Sofranko, Adriana
A1  - van Thriel, Christoph
A1  - Unfried, Klaus
T1  - Discussion on Existing Standards and Quality Criteria in Nanosafety Research
N2  - The partners of the research project NanoS-QM (Quality- and Description Standards for Nanosafety Research Data) identified and invited relevant experts from research institutions, federal agencies, and industry to evaluate the traceability of the results generated with the existing standards and quality criteria. During the discussion it emerged that numerous studies seem to be of insufficient quality for regulatory purposes or exhibit weaknesses with regard to data completeness. Deficiencies in study design could be avoided by more comprehensive use of appropriate standards, many of which already exist. The use of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) that allow for early collection of metadata and enrichment of datasets could be one solution to enable data re-use and simplify quality control. Generally, earlier provision and curation of data and metadata indicating their quality and completeness (e.g. guidelines, standards, standard operating procedures (SOPs) that were used) would improve their findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) in the nanosafety research field.
KW  - Nanomaterials
KW  - Nanosafety
KW  - Data quality
KW  - Description standards
KW  - Metadata
KW  - Material characterization
KW  - Toxicology
KW  - Regulation
KW  - Workshop
KW  - Discussion
Y2  - 2021
UN  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:291:415-5167
U6  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584790
DO  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584790
SP  - 36 S.
S1  - 36 S.
ER  -